Rwazi built Sena, a Decision AI that shows energy teams which project sites are ready and where charging fits, from site photos and consented resident input.
Utility customer analytics reads meter and network data. What gets built and sold also turns on site conditions, the community around each project, and the reasons customers pick an offer.
Sequential site checks can take months, and a disqualifying condition or community objection often surfaces late in the process.
Sena. Sena assesses a full pipeline in parallel: land, access, environmental indicators, and community context, so a failing site drops out before capital goes in.
A map-based plan places a charger before anyone sees the site. The site itself shows access, amenities, working status, and nearby rivals.
Sena. Sena captures the nearby stations and scores each candidate site on access, competition, and likely use.
Two areas with matching usage can respond very differently to a tariff, a bundle, or a green offer.
Sena. Sena captures consented household input on the offers customers would pick or switch to, so each area gets the offer it will take up.
Each decision links to its method page, with the signals Sena reads and the questions energy teams bring.
Sena assesses the sites in a pipeline, from land and access to community sentiment, then scores each on readiness.
Decides: Which sites move forward and which wait.
See renewable site assessment →Sena captures the nearby stations, their access, working status, and amenities, plus consented driver input, then scores candidate sites on access, competition, and likely use.
Decides: Where the next charging points go.
See EV charging site scoring →Sena repeats the geo-verified site read through construction, on the cycle the team sets.
Decides: Which sites need attention before inspection.
See site reads through construction →Households in the target area evaluate the offer, its price, and the alternatives they use today.
Decides: Which offer and price go to market.
See concept testing and launch validation →The site readiness reading covers one project pipeline, with the photos behind every site.
Get the site readiness reading →Sena ties each site score to the captures that produced it, so a team checks any score against its photos.
Each site reading carries its photos, location, and date, so a readiness score rests on what the site shows.
People share views directly, with explicit consent, and every capture clears a multi-level QA flow before it counts.
Development readiness combines what a site shows and what its community says. Sena captures land, access, and environmental indicators through geo-verified photos, and resident sentiment through consented input, for every site in the pipeline.
The site readiness calculator. Three counts show how much of a pipeline is ready to build.
A walkthrough runs Sena on one pipeline or one service area, from site photo and household input to the decision on the table.
Book a walkthrough →Pick the closest fit, and the walkthrough starts on that team's question.
Site readiness and community sentiment across a full pipeline.
Book a development walkthrough →Site scoring on access, nearby stations, and likely use.
Book a charging walkthrough →Resident sentiment by site, ahead of the hearing.
Book a permitting walkthrough →Where demand, sites, and competition line up across markets.
Book a strategy walkthrough →A real Sena reading for one project pipeline across three to five markets, with the photos behind every site score.
Sena captures geo-verified photos and consumer activity in the markets a question names, when the question needs it.
Sena reads those captures beside the files and systems already in use, across 250+ integrations.
Sena compares the market against the plan and shows each gap, with every figure traced to its source.
| Area | Common method | Sena |
|---|---|---|
| Site assessment | Sequential checks, one site after another | Each site assessed on land, access, and community |
| Community risk | Objections heard at the public hearing | Resident sentiment captured ahead of the hearing |
| Charging placement | Map-based placement before the site is seen | Access, working status, and rivals captured at each site |
| Offer design | Usage trends carried over from other areas | Households state which offers they would pick or switch to |
| Auditing | Site files reconciled by hand | Each site score opens the photos behind it |
Talk to the team about one pipeline, one service area, and the decision due this quarter.
Talk to the team →